make
Make
Visual workflow automation (formerly Integromat)
DSGVO: conformEU-AI-Act: limitedFree tier
AI tool comparison
Make vs. n8n
A practical comparison of Make and n8n across pricing, GDPR, EU AI Act risk, and workflow fit.
n8n
n8n
Open-source automation with AI nodes
DSGVO: conformEU-AI-Act: limitedFree tier
Side-by-side comparison
| Factor | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free tier | Free tier |
| GDPR | conform | conform |
| EU AI Act | limited | limited |
| Data residency | eu | eu |
| Use cases | Multimodal, Customer communication, Automate | Code, Multimodal, Build & code, Automate |
| Data quality | — | — |
| Updated | 6/15/2026 | 6/15/2026 |
Choose Make when
Czech vendor with detailed visual editor + affordable operations. AI steps via OpenAI/Anthropic modules.
Choose n8n when
Berlin-based, source-available. Self-host or cloud. Native AI nodes for LangChain, OpenAI, Anthropic, vector DBs.
Related comparisons
- Make vs. Gemini
Google's multimodal chatbot with deep Workspace integration
- Make vs. Zapier
Workflow automation with built-in AI steps
- Make vs. Perplexity
Answer engine with citations — AI-powered research
- Make vs. Bolt.new
Full web apps from prompts — in the browser
- Make vs. Gamma
AI-generated presentations, docs, and websites
Need a recommendation for your exact workflow?
The finder weighs budget, compliance needs, industry, and existing subscriptions instead of treating every comparison as generic.
Find the best fit