Back to tools

AI tool comparison

n8n vs. Sourcegraph Cody

A practical comparison of n8n and Sourcegraph Cody across pricing, GDPR, EU AI Act risk, and workflow fit.

n8n

n8n

Open-source automation with AI nodes

DSGVO: conformEU-AI-Act: limitedFree tier

sourcegraph

Sourcegraph Cody

Code AI with codebase-wide context

DSGVO: conformEU-AI-Act: limitedFree tier

Side-by-side comparison

Factorn8nSourcegraph Cody
PricingFree tierFree tier
GDPRconformconform
EU AI Actlimitedlimited
Data residencyeueu
Use casesCode, Multimodal, Build & code, AutomateCode, Build & code
Data quality
Updated6/15/20266/15/2026

Choose n8n when

Berlin-based, source-available. Self-host or cloud. Native AI nodes for LangChain, OpenAI, Anthropic, vector DBs.

Choose Sourcegraph Cody when

Deeply integrated with Sourcegraph code search; understands large monorepos. Choose GPT, Claude, Gemini.

Related comparisons

Need a recommendation for your exact workflow?

The finder weighs budget, compliance needs, industry, and existing subscriptions instead of treating every comparison as generic.

Find the best fit