continue
Continue
Open-source code assistant — bring your own model
DSGVO: conformEU-AI-Act: minimalFree tier
AI tool comparison
Continue vs. DeepSeek
A practical comparison of Continue and DeepSeek across pricing, GDPR, EU AI Act risk, and workflow fit.
deepseek
DeepSeek
Chinese chatbot with strong reasoning, very cheap
DSGVO: non_conformEU-AI-Act: unknownFree tier
Side-by-side comparison
| Factor | Continue | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free tier | Free tier |
| GDPR | conform | non_conform |
| EU AI Act | minimal | unknown |
| Data residency | on_prem | us |
| Use cases | Code, Build & code | Text, Code, Research & analyze, Summarize & structure |
| Data quality | — | — |
| Updated | 6/15/2026 | 6/15/2026 |
Choose Continue when
VS Code / JetBrains plugin that wires up any LLM (local via Ollama, API via OpenAI/Anthropic). Full control.
Choose DeepSeek when
DeepSeek-V3 / R1 with impressive reasoning at fractional pricing. Open-weights, but hosted service in China.
Related comparisons
- Continue vs. Claude
Anthropic's chatbot with strong reasoning and long context
- Continue vs. Cursor
VS Code-based IDE with deep AI integration
- Continue vs. GitHub Copilot
IDE AI assistant from GitHub/Microsoft
- Continue vs. Claude Code
Anthropic's code agent for terminal and IDE
- Continue vs. Windsurf (ehem. Codeium)
Cascade agent in its own IDE — generous free tier
Need a recommendation for your exact workflow?
The finder weighs budget, compliance needs, industry, and existing subscriptions instead of treating every comparison as generic.
Find the best fit